راهبردهای سیاست خارجی در وضعیت گذار قدرت: ایران و عربستان سعودی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه اردکان، اردکان، ایران

چکیده

اصولاً گذار، پدیده‌ای رایج در سیستم بین‌الملل از زمان پیدایش آن می‌باشد. جدا از سیستم بین‌الملل، گذار در مناطق نیز قابلیت تبیین دارد. در حال حاضر یکی از مناطقی که شدیداً تحت تأثیر وضعیت گذار قرار دارد، خاورمیانه است و دو بازیگری که به‌شدت از این پدیده متأثر هستند، ایران و عربستان می‌باشند. بنابراین پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از تئوری «گذار قدرت»، سعی به تبیین راهبردهای سیاست خارجی در وضعیت گذار قدرت و در روابط ایران و عربستان دارد. بدین منظور، پرسش پژوهش این است که «راهبرد بازیگران در وضعیت گذار قدرت و راهبرد ایران و عربستان به‌عنوان مطالعۀ موردی، مبتنی بر چه اصولی می‌باشد؟». در پاسخ به پرسش مذکور این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که راهبرد بازیگران در وضعیت گذار قدرت با توجه به محوری و پیرامونی بودن بازیگران و نوع ساختار گذاری که در آن درگیر می‌باشند، شکل می‌گیرد. در ادامه، پژوهش با مفروض پنداشتن وضعیت گذار در خاورمیانه به راهبردهای ایران و عربستان در وضعیت گذارگونۀ خاورمیانه پرداخته است.
 

تازه های تحقیق

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Foreign Policy Strategies in the situation of Power Transition: Iran and Saudi Arabia

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Faraji
Assistant Professor of International Relations, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Basically, transition is a common phenomenon in the international system since its emersion. Apart from the international system, transition ability also be explained in the regions. Currently, one of the areas that most affected by the situation transition is the Middle East, and the two actors most affected by this phenomenon are Iran and Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the article with using the theory of "power transition", tries to explain the foreign policy strategies in situation of power transition and in the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia. In this regard, the research question is based on "what principles is governor on strategy of the actors in situation the transition of power and the strategy of Iran and Saudi Arabia as a case study?" In answer to the above question, this hypothesis proposed that the strategy of the actors in situation the transition of power is formed according to the centrality and periphery of the actors and the type of structure transition in which they are involved. Continuation, the research with supposing assumption the transition situation in the Middle East, discusses with the strategies of Iran and Saudi Arabia in the transitional situation of the Middle East.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Middle East
  • strategy
  • Foreign Policy
  • transition of power
  • regions

مراجع

  • دهشیری، محمدرضا و حسینی، سید محمدحسین (1395). ژئوپلیتیک منطقه و روابط ایران و عربستان. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، 8(1).
  • سلیمی، حسین، دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سید جلال و پوراسمعیلی، نجمیه (1396). مدل و تحلیل نظری رابطه نظام منطقه‌ای و سیاست خارجی. فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک،13(3).
  • قاسمی، فرهاد (1396). اصول روابط بین‌الملل. تهران، نشر میزان.
  • قاسمی، فرهاد (1389). مدل ژئوپلیتیکی امنیت منطقه‌ای: مطالعه موردی خاورمیانه. فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، 6(2).
  • قاسمی، فرهاد (1397). گذار در سیستم‌های بین‌المللی پیچیده _ آشوبی: ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست، 7(1).
  • نجفی سیار، رحمان و قلخانباز، خلیل (1396). دلایل و نشانگان رویکرد تهاجمی عربستان علیه جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، 9(3).
  • Alsharabati, C. & Kugler, J. (2015). Global and Regional Power Dynamics after the Arab Revolutions.
  • Barbarási, A. L. & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-511. https://doi.org /10.1126/ science. 286.5439.509.
  • Białoskórski, R. (2019). The international distribution of power in the Middle East and North Africa. A powermetric approach. Przegląd Geopolityczny, (30), 29-46. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/ bwmeta1.element.desklight-8dbd59e0-a710-4e7f-8589-5c3511fa7412.
  • Chan, S. (2007). China, the US and the Power-transition Theory: A Critique. NewYork and London, Routledge. ISBN 9780415440240 Published November 12, 2007 by Routledge 216 Pages. https:// www.routledge. com/China-the-US-and-the-Power-Transition-Theory-A-Critique/Chan/ p/ book/9780415440240.
  • Chen, V. (2017). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Sectarianism, a Quest for Regional Hegemony and International Alignments, Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 1000. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_ capstone/1000.
  • Destradi, S. (2010). Regional powers and their strategies: empire, hegemony and leadership. Review of international studies, 36(4), 903-930.‏ https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961960.
  • Efird, B., Kugler, J. & Genna, G. (2010). From war to integration: Generalizing power transition theory. International Interactions, 29(4), 293-313. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/714950654.
  • Efird, B. & Genna, G. M. (2002). Structural conditions and the propensity for regional integration. European Union Politics, 3(3), 267-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003001.
  • Frazier, D. & Stewart-Ingersoll, R. (2010). Regional powers and security: A framework for understanding order within regional security complexes. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 731-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109359847.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/ir/ academic/ subjects/ politics-international-relations/international-relations-and-international-organisations/ war- and- change- world- politics? format= HB& isbn= 9780521240185.
  • Gochmann, C. (1990). “Capability-Driven Disputes.” In Prisoners of War? Nation States in the Modern Era (C. Gochmann and A.N. Sabrosky, eds), 141–159. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. https://www.amazon. com/ Prisoners-War-Nation-States-Modern-Era/dp/0669171417.
  • Grumet, T. (2015). New Middle East Cold War: Saudi Arabia and Iran's Rivalry. University of Denver. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1028/.
  • Guzansky, Y. & Dekel, U. (2015). Recognizing Iran as a Nuclear Threshold State: Implications for Israel and the Middle East. The Institute for National Security Studies, March 25, 2015. Accessed April 21, 2015. http://www.inss.org.il/index.aspx?id=4538&articleid=9004.
  • Harris, P. (2014). Problems with power-transition theory: Beyond the vanishing disparities thesis. Asian Security, 10(3), 241-259. https://doi.org/10. 1080/ 14799855.2014.983634.
  • Haungs, M., Sallee, P. & Farrens, M. (2000, January). Branch transition rate: a new metric for improved branch classification analysis. In Proceedings Sixth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture. HPCA-6 (Cat. No. PR00550) (pp. 241-250). IEEE.‏ DOI: 10.1109/HPCA.2000.824354.
  • Heylighen, F. (1992). Principles of Systems and Cybernetics: an evolutionary perspective. Cybernetics and systems, 92(1992), 3-10. pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/PrinciplesCybSys.pdf.
  • Kausch, K. (2015). Competitive multipolarity in the Middle East. The International Spectator, 50(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729. 2015.1055927.
  • Kohout, F. (2003). Cyclical, Hegemonic, and Pluralistic Theories of International Relations: Some Comparative Reflections on War Causation. International Political Science Review 24(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512103024001003.
  • Kugler, j. & organski, A.F.K. (1980). Deterrence and the Arms Race: The Impotence of Power, CGU Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. This article first appeared as Kugler, Jacek, A. F. K. Organski, and Daniel J. Fox, "Deterrence and the arms race: the impotence of power," International Security, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Spring, 1980), pp. 105-138, and can be found online at http://www.jstor.org/ stable/ pdfplus/2626670.pdf.
  • Kugler, J. & Organski, A.F.K. (1989). The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation. In Handbook of War Studies (M.I. Midlarsky, ed.), 171–194. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  • Kugler, J. & Zagare, F. C. (1990). The Long-term Stability of Deterrence. International Interactions, Vol.15, No.34. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03050629008434733.
  • Lebow, R. N. & Valentino, B. (2009). Lost in Transition: A Critical Analysis of Power Transition Theory. International Relations, 23(3), 389-410. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047117809340481.
  • Lacroix, S., Haykel, B., & Hegghammer, T. (2015). Saudi Arabia in Transition. Insights on Social, Political, Economic and Religious Change (No. hal-01534279). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047586.
  • Lee, D. S, (2006). When are Power Shifts Dangerous?: Military Strategy and Preventive War. Journal of International and Area Studies, Vol.13, No.2 . https://www.jstor.org/stable/43111457.
  • Lemke, D. & Werner, S. (1996). Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War. International Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 235-260. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/ 2600958.
  • Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of War and Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491511.
  • Lemke, D. (1997). The Continuation of History: Power Transition Theory and the End of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research 34(23): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343397034001003.
  • Matthiesen, T. (2013). Sectarian gulf: Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the Arab Spring that wasn't. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/ books/ title/?id=23053.
  • Modelski, G. & W.R. Thompson (1989). Long Cycles and Global Wars. In Handbook of War Studies (M.I. Midlarsky, ed.), 23–54. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  • Myerson, R. B. (2007). Force and Restraint in Strategic Deterrence A Game – Theorists Perspective, Chicago Humanities Festival on Peace and War, November 11, 2006. EPUB, PDF - read eReader instructions.
  • Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, Vol.36, n.4, p.881-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X.
  • Nolte, D. (2006). Power and Power Hierarchies in International Relations: Towards an Analytical Concept for the Study of Regional Powers. GIGA, working paper.
  • Organski, A.F.K. (1958). World Politics. New York: Knopf.
  • Parkes, A. (2019). Power Shifts in the Saudi-Iranian Strategic Competition. Global Security and Intelligence Studies, Volume 4, Number 1, Spring / Summer 2019 . https://doi.org/10.18278/gsis.4.1.3.
  • Poulin, K. (2012). Intervention from Above: The United States, Russia, and Power Transition in the Middle East. Senior honors thesis, Department of Political Science, Indian University, 1-2.
  • Shabbir, M. (2013). Emerging Middle East: Interplay of the New Power Centers, ISSRA Papers. https://ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/issra-paper/ ISSRA_ Papers_ Vol5_ IssueI_2013/02-EMERGING-MIDDLE-EAST- Mr-Shabbir.pdf.
  • Snyder, G. H. (1997). Alliance Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. American Political Science Review,Volume 94,Issue 3. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2585919.
  • Takeyh, R. (2009). Guardians of the Revolution: Iran and the World in the Age of the Ayatollahs. New York: Oxford University Press. https://www. amazon. com/ Guardians- Revolution- Iran- World Ayatollahs/ dp/ 0199754101.
  • Tammen, R. L. & Kugler, J. (2006). Power Transition and China–US Conflicts. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol.1, No.1. https:// doi.org/ 10.1093/ cjip/pol003.
  • Von Foerster, H., Yovits, M. C. & Cameron, S. (1959). On self-organizing systems and their environments. Heinz von Foerster, 1. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-21722-3_1.
  • Walt, S. (1997). Why alliances endure or collapse. Journal Survival Global Politics and Strategy, Volume 39, 1997 - Issue 1. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00396339708442901.
  • Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393. https://www.nature.com/articles/30918.
  • Zagare, F. C. & Kilgour, D. M. (2000). Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491788

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار