International Quarterly of Foreign Relations

International Quarterly of Foreign Relations

Iran and System efficiency model; Transition from a confrontational environment to a fractal foreign policy centered on regional interaction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran.
2 MA Student of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran.
Abstract
Efficiency is one of the strategic components in order to empower the political system and system, which in its macro and final dimension creates a unified and organized systemic order in a chaotic and chaotic environment. In the field of foreign policy, countries are always trying to be considered as an efficient model by modeling their influence and influence in regional and non-peripheral regions by streamlining regional and international activities. Basically, in turbulent environments where various stressful inputs enter a decision-making system, pursuing an ingenious foreign policy that can neutralize these inputs and manage systemic transformations is of strategic importance. In the Middle East, due to the conflict and chaotic inputs to the existing system and basically a processed environment with conflict and the pursuit of an intelligent foreign policy, the requirements and requirements of a government are taken into account. To this end, the main question of the present study is what path should the Islamic Republic of Iran take in its regional environment to transition from a confrontational order to an interactive and fractal platform? In response to this question, the hypothesis has been raised that it is necessary for the Islamic Republic of Iran to implement an effective type of activism in the new century in such a region in order to change the paradigm. Findings show that the foreign policy model of Iran's regions in order to systemic-regional efficiency of the fractal foreign policy model should be interactive. This article will take a descriptive-analytical approach in
Keywords

Subjects


Bianca, Cinzia, (2020). The GCC Monarchies: Perceptions of the Iranian Threat Shifting Geopolitics, The international Spectator, Vol.55, No.20. pp.: 92-107.
Cannon, Brennon, and Federico Donnelly (2019), “Asymmetric alliance and high Polarity: Evaluating regional Security Complexes in the Middle East and North Africa”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3. Pp. 505-524.
Easton, David (1965), a System Analysis of Political Life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Hanieh, Adam, (2019). “New Geo-graphics of financial Power Global finance and the Gulf”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3. Pp. 525-546.
Kagan, Robert, (2007) Return of History, Policy Review, Vol.144, No. 2, pp. 1-17.
Khatib, Dania Koleilat (2021), the Syrian Crisis, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5050-8.
Koch, Bettina and Stivachtis, A. (2019) “Regional Security in the Middle East: Sectors, Variables and Issues”, Bristol, England.
Kvangraven, I. H. (2017), a Dependency Pioneer, Dialogues on Development, Volume I: Dependency, Retrieved from http://www.ineteconomics.org/ uploads/ .../Dependency-Theory-e-Book-Comp.pdf.
Modelski, G. (1987), “The Long Cycle of global Politics and the nation-state”, Comparative Studies in Society and history, 20(2), 214-235.
Pederson, Thomas, (2003). Cooperative Hegemony: power Ideals and Institution in Regional international, Review of international Studies, Vol.28.
Rabi, Uzi and Mueller, Chelsi (2018). The Geo-politics of Sectarianism in the Persian Gulf, Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1.
Rezaei, Farhad (2019), “Iran’s Foreign Policy after the Nuclear Agreement”, New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Trenin, D. (2016). Russia in the Middle East: Moscow’s objectives, Priorities, and Policy drivers. Retrieved from http://Carnegieendowment.org/files/ 03-25-16-Trenin-Middel-East-Moscow-Clean.pdf.