روندپژوهی الگوی رفتاری فرانسه در شورای امنیت سازمان ملل متحد (2019- 1945)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکترای سیاست تطبیقی و پژوهشگر دوره پسادکتری

چکیده

ناسازگاری نظم جهان یالتایی با درک فرانسه و تلاش برای تفوق بر نظام مسلط بر اساس منطق الیگارشی بین‌المللی در عصر جنگ سرد و بازیگری موازنه‌ساز در عصر پساجنگ سرد اهتمام اصلی پاریس تلقی می‌شود. به بیان دیگر، گذار از مقدس‌سازی گسترده، عقلانیت ایدئولوژیک و گلیسم تهاجمی عصر جنگ سرد به‌سوی پراگماتیسم، دیپلماسی تعدیل منازعه و موازنه‌سازی، دگردیسی‌هایی در رفتار رأی‌دهی فرانسه در شورای امنیت ایجاد کرد. چنین چرخشی ناشی از بسترمندی و زمینه پروردگی گلیسم فرانسوی بود. بر این اساس پرسش از منطق رفتار رأی‌دهی فرانسه در شورای امنیت، اهتمام اصلی پژوهش جاری بوده است. پایداری اهداف استراتژیک و چرخش تاکتیکی دکترین مسلط رفتاری پاریس تلقی شده و در واقع، دستیابی به موقعیت و پرستیژ بین‌المللی و تبدیل شدن به بازیگر متنفذ در عرصه جهانی بر اساس سه اصل «استقلال»، «کنش‌گرایی» و «حضور بین‌المللی» فرضیه اصلی این تحقیق بوده است. برآورد رفتار رأی‌دهی نیازمند تبیین سطوح خرد، میانی و کلان سیاست خارجی پاریس بوده و پژوهش حاضر با روش‌شناسی تحلیلی- تطبیقی و بر اساس تز تغییر قدرت و موازنه قوا به آزمون فرضیه تحقیق پرداخته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Process- Tracing of French Behavior Model in the United Nations Security Council (1945- 2019)

نویسنده [English]

  • Vahid Zolfaghari
PhD in Comparative Politics and Post-doc Researcher
چکیده [English]

The cleavage between Yalta global order and French perception and trying to influence on dominant order based on the logic of international oligarchy during the cold war and balancing actor in the post-cold war is the main attempt of France. In other words, transition from enlarged sanctuarization, ideologic rationality and offensive Gaullism towards pragmatism, diplomacy of conflict mitigation and balancing power led to changing the France’s voting behavior in the Security Council. Such evolution is caused by context-dependency of French Gaullism. Thus, the main question of the current paper is to understand the logic of France’s voting behavior in the SC. In fact, restoring international position and prestige and trying to identify as game-changer based upon independence, activism, and international presence is the main hypothesis of this paper. Nevertheless, appraising the French voting behavior necessitates to analyze the micro, meso and macro levels of foreign policy. The current paper will test the hypothesis with analytic-comparative method and power transition theory and balance of power.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Security Council
  • Veto Power
  • Gaullism
  • European Union
  • France
خالوزاده، سعید. 1392. سیاست‌های فرا آتلانتیکی فرانسه در دوران نیکلا سارکوزی. فصلنامه مطالعات جهان، 3 (2)، 348-328.
Breslin, J., & Fred Wettering and Dan Gaske. 1994. De Gaulle, NATO, and Gaullist Foreign Policy (National War College, Washington, DC).
Brummer, K & Thies, C. G. 2015. “The Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions”, Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 273-293
Drosenrode, S. and Stubkjaer, A. 2002. The European Union and the Middle East. London: Sheffield Academic Press.
Du Monteil, E. 2015. 5 Times France Voted Against America at the United Nations.
Gaffney, J. 2004. Highly Emotional States: French- US Relations and the Iraq War. European Security, 13(3).
Gaulle, C. de. 1971. Memoirs of Hope: Renewal and Endeavor. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gordon, P. H. 1993. A Certain Idea of France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gordon, P. H. 1995. France, Germany and the Western Alliance. New York: Westview Press.
Grant, R. 1986. French Defense Policy and European Security. In Robbin F. Laird (Ed.), French Security Policy: From Independence to Interdependence: 9–28. London: Westview Press.
Harrison, M. M. 1981. The Reluctant Ally: France and Atlantic Security. London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Howarth, David and Georgios Varaouxakis. 2003. Contemporary France: An Introduction to French Politics and Society. London: Oxford University Press.
Huntington, S. 1999. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, 78: 35–49.
International Crisis Group. 2012. Syria's Mutating Conflict. Middle East Report, 128.
Irondelle, B. 2008. Europena Foreign Policy: The End of French Europe? European Integration, 30(1): 153–168.
Jae-Seung, L. 2006. Defending the National Interests? Rethinking France and the Iraq War. The Korean Journal of International Relations, 46(5): 73–94.
Kolodziej, E. A. 1974. French International Policy under De Gaulle and Pompidou. London: Cornell University Press.
Krotz, U. 2002. National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policies: France and Germany Compared. Cambridge, MA: Program for the Study of Germany and Europe Working Paper 02.1.
Krotz, Ulrich and James Sperling. 2011. The European Security Order between American Hegemony and French Independence. European Security, 20(3): 305–335.
Laird, R. F. 1985. France, the Soviet Union, and the Nuclear Weapons Issue. London: Westview Press.
Larson, Welch and Deborah and Alexei Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Russian and Chinese Responses to US Primacy. International Security, 34(4): 63–95.
Lehne, S. 2012. The Big Three in EU Foreign Policy. Washington D.C: Carbegie Endowment for International Peace.
Lynch, K. 2009. China and the security Council: Congruence of the Voting between Permanent Members. China Paper(5): 1–31.
Marcel, V. 2003. Total in Iraq: The Brookings Institution.
Menendez Alarcon, Antonio V. 2014. French and US Approaches to Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Menon, A. 2000. France, NATO and the Limits of Independence 1981-97: The Politics of Ambivalence. London: MacMillan Press, Inc.
Meunier, S. 2007. The Distinctiveness of French Anti-Americanism. In Peter Katzenstein and Robert O. Keohane (Ed.), Anti-Americanisms in World Politics: 129–156. New York: Cornell University Press.
Michel, L. G. 2012. Cross-Currents in French Defense and U.S. Interests. Strategic Perspectives, 10: 1–48.
Miller, John J. and Mark Molesky. 2004. Our Oldest Enemy: A History of America's Disastrous Relationship with France. New York: Doubleday.
Minarova, M. 2015. The UN Security Council: The Voting Procedure and Effectiveness, University of Karlova v Praze.
Muller, P. 2013. The Europeanization of France's Foreign Policy towards the Middle East Conflict- from Leadership to EU- Accommodation. European Security, 22(1): 113–128.
Nocetti, Julien. 2018. “ The Digital Domain: between Protection and Ambitions for Leadership”, in; Macron, Diplomat: A New French Foreign Policy. Thomas Gomart and Marc Hecker (ed), (pp. 29-33). France, Etudes de l’Ifri, Ifri.
Pape, R. A. 2005. Soft Balancing Against the United States. International Security, 30(1): 7–45.
Perthes, V. 2002. Germany and the Middle East: Interests and Options. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Stiftung/Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Rieker, Pernille. 2017. French Foreign Policy in a Changing World. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Styan, D. 2004. Jacques Chirac's 'non': France, Iraq and the United Nations, 1991-2003. Modern & Contemporary France.
Tardy, Thierry and Dominik Zaum. 2016. “France and United Kingdom in the Security Council”, In; The UN Security Council in the 21st Century. Sebastien von Einsiedel, David M. Malone, and Bruno Stagno Ugarte (ed), (pp. 121- 133), London, Lynne Rienner.
Verbeke, J. 2006. EU Coordination on UN Security Council Matters. In Jan Wouters, Frank Hoffmeister and Tom Ruys (Ed.), The United Nations and the European Union: An Ever Stronger Partnership: 49–60. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
Waites, N. H. 1983. French Foreign Policy: External Influences on the Quest for Independence. Review of International Studies, 9: 251–264.
Williamson, H. 2004. Germany to Fight for Seat on Security Council. Financial Times. 2004.
Yost, D. S. 1985. France and Conventional Defense in Central Europe. London: Westview Press.