فصلنامه روابط خارجی

فصلنامه روابط خارجی

سیستم کنترل چندپیکری و نظم‌های منطقه‌ای :شبکه منطقه‌ای ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
فرهاد قاسمی 1
سیده بنت الهدا هاشمی 2
1 دانشیار گروه روابط بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران
2 دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
10.22034/fr.2023.398942.1386
چکیده
سیستم کنترل نظم منطقه‌ای متاثر از تغییر ساختار و تغییر الگوی نظم بین‌الملل دگرگون شده‌است. در این میان یکی از پویش‌های کنترل نظم شبکه‌ایران، نوپدیدگی در قالب فرسایش ساختار تک‌قطبی سیستم جهانی و ظهور کانون‌های نوین قدرت در قالب پیکربندی‌های چندگانه‌است. بر همین اساس این پرسش اصلی مطرح می‌گردد که سازه چندپیکره نظم‌های منطقه‌ای چه تاثیری بر الگوهای کنترل نظم قدرت‌های منطقه‌ای در شبکه منطقه‌ایران دارد؟ دراین مقاله استدلال می‌شود که سازه چندپیکره ،الگوهای کنترل نظم منطقه‌ای را از قطبیت محوری به سمت کانون محوری سوق می‌دهد بر این اساس کنترل نظم در شبکه منطقه‌ای ایران در ابعاد سازه‌ها، دینامیک‌ها، چرخه‌ها، رفتارهای بازیگران و راهبرد کنترل متحول شده‌است و کنترل نظم شبکه منطقه‌ای ایران بر مبنای راهبرد انطباقی_شاخه‌ای شبکه‌های چندپیکره متداخل تنظیم می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از روش ابداکتیو در گام نخست نوپدیدگی در عناصر گوناگون نظم در قالب سازه، چرخه‌های قدرت، پویایی‌ها و مدل‌های کنترل را بررسی می‌کند سپس چارچوب نظری مناسب برای واقعیات نوپدید در قالب شبکه‌های پیچیده ارائه می‌گردد و با استفاده از آن کنترل نظم در شبکه منطقه‌ای ایران تبیین می‌شود. در نهایت راهبردکنترلی شاخه‌ای-انطباقی مبتنی بر مفهوم کانونیت و متناسب با محیط منطقه‌ای ایران به عنوان دستاورد پژوهش تبیین می‌گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کنترل نظم
نوپدیدگی
راهبرد انطباقی-شاخه‌ای
شبکه متداخل چندپیکره
قطبیت

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Multibody control system and regional order: Iran's regional network

نویسندگان English

Farhad Ghasemi 1
Seyede Bentolhoda Hashemi 2
1 Associate Professor of International Relations, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran
2 PHD of International Relations, International Relations Department, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The regional order control system has been affected by the change in the structure and the change in the pattern of the international order.in the meantime, one of the campaigns to control the order of the Iranian network is the erosion of the unipolar structure of the global system and the emergence of new centers of power in the form of multiple configurations.based on this, the main question is raised, what effect does the multibody structure of regional orders have on the order control patterns of regional powers in Iran's regional network?
In this article, it is argued that the multibody structure moves regional order control patterns from axial polarity to axial centers, based on this, order control in Iran's regional network in the dimensions of structures, dynamics, cycles, actors' behaviors and strategy of control has changed and the control of order in Iran’s regional network is set based on the cluster-adaptive strategy of multibody nested networks. Using the abduction method, in the first step, the present research examines the emergence of various elements of order in the form of structures, power cycles, dynamics, and control models, and provides a suitable theoretical framework for emerging realities in the form of complex networks. By using it, order in Iran’s regional network is explained. Finally, the cluster-adaptive control strategy based on the concept of focality and appropriate to the regional environment of Iran is explained as the inovation of the research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Order control
Multibody nested networks
Cluster-adaptive strateg
Emergence
Polarity
  • ­ قاسمی، فرهاد (۱۳۹0). نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل و مطالعات منطقه‌ای. تهران: میزان.
  • ­ قاسمی، فرهاد (۱۳۹۷). نظریه پیچیدگی- آشوب و جنگ در روابط بین‌الملل، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
  • ­ قاسمی، فرهاد؛ هاشمی، سیده بنت‌الهدی (1401). واپایش نظم در شبکه‌های منطقه‌ای پیچیده: ایران و غرب آسیا. فصلنامه سیاست, 62(52), 453-482.‌

 

References

  • ­ Abdenur, Adriana Erthal (2016).Rising powers and international security: the BRICS and the Syrian conflict. Rising Powers Quarterly1: 109-133.
  • ­ Acharya, A. (2007). The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World politics, 59(4), 629-652.
  • ­ Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional WorldsA New Agenda for International Studies. International studies quarterly, 58(4), 647-659.
  • ­ Alterman, Jon. B. (2019). Chinese and Russian influence in the Middle East. Middle East Policy, 26(2), 129-136.
  • ­ Amour, Philipp O. (2020).The Regional Order in the Gulf Region and the Middle East. Cham: Springer International Publishing.‌
  • ­ Asheim, Bjørn T., et al. )2017(. The role of clusters and public policy in new regional economic path development. The life cycle of clusters. Edward Elgar Publishing, 13-34.
  • ­ Bahgat, Gawdat. (2007). Iran and the United States: The emerging security paradigm in the Middle East. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 37(2), 2.
  • ­ Beck, Martin. (2014). The concept of regional power as applied to the Middle East." Regional Powers in the Middle East: New Constellations after the Arab Revolts: 1-20.
  • ­ Beeson, M. (2020). The Decline of the West: What is It, and why Might it Matter?. Asia Global Institute, The University of Hong Kong. Chicago
  • ­ Berenskoetter, Felix, and M. J. Williams. (2007). Thinking about power. In Power in world politics, 11-32. Routledge.
  • ­ Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2015). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China's rise and the fate of America's global position. International security, 40(3), 7-53.
  • ­ Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and powers: the structure of international security. Cambridge University Press, (91).
  • ­ Carr, E. H. (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: Reissued with New Introduction.
  • ­ Chaziza, Mordechai. (2020). China's Middle East diplomacy: the belt and road strategic partnership. Liverpool University Press.
  • ­ Choksy, Carol, and Jamsheed K. Choksy. (2015). The Saudi connection: Wahhabism and global jihad. World Affairs: 23-34.
  • ­ Clowes, David, and Dominika Choroś-Mrozowska. (2015). Aspects of global security–the measurement of power & its projection." Journal of International Studies 8.1: 53-66.
  • ­ Dannreuther, R. (2022). Understanding Russia’s return to the Middle East. In Russia’s Role in World Politics: Power, Ideas, and Domestic Influences 15-31. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  • ­ DiCicco, Jonathan M., & Levy, Jack. S. (1999). Power shifts and problem shifts: The evolution of the power transition research program. Journal of conflict resolution, 43(6), 675-704.
  • ­ Dorussen, H, et al. (2016). Networked international politics: Complex interdependence and the diffusion of conflict and peace. Journal of peace research, 53(3), 283-291.
  • ­ Efron S, et al. (2019). The Evolving Israel-China Relationship. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  • ­ Flemes, Daniel. (2013). Network Powers: strategies of change in the multipolar system, Third World Quarterly 34, 6: 1016-1036,‌ <DOI:10.1080/01436597.2013.802504>.
  • ­ Fulton, J. (2020). Situating Saudi Arabia in China's Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Politics & Policy, 12(3), 362-383.
  • ­ Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., et al. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International organization : 559-592.‌ <DOI:10.1017/S0020818309090195>
  • ­ Heisbourg, F. (Ed.). (1989). The Changing Strategic Landscape. London: Macmillan.
  • ­ Heylighen, Francis. (2001). The science of self-organization and adaptivity." The encyclopedia of life support systems 5.3: 253-280.
  • ­ Hudson, Michael. C. (1996). To play the hegemon: Fifty years of US policy toward the middle east. The Middle East Journal, 329-343.
  • ­ Ikenberry, G. John. (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: New Jersey Princeton University Press.
  • ­ Joseph, J. (2010). The international as emergent: challenging old and new orthodoxies in international relations theory. Scientific realism and international relations, 51-68.
  • ­ Kahler, M. (Ed.). (2011). Networked politics: agency, power, and governance. Cornell University Press.
  • ­ Kamrava, M. (2018). Multipolarity and instability in the Middle East. Orbis, 62(4), 598-616.
  • ­ Kavalski, Emilian. (2007). The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 3: 435-454, ‌ <DOI:10.1080/09557570701574154>.
  • ­ Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158-165.
  • ­ Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • ­ Kugler, J., & Organski, A. F. K. (1989). The end of hegemony?. International Interactions, 15(2), 113-128.
  • ­ Lake, David A., and Patrick M. Morgan. (2010). Regional orders: Building security in a new world. Penn State Press.
  • ­ Lake, D. & Morgan, P. M. (1997). The new regionalism in security affairs. Regional orders: Building security in a new world, (1), 3-19.
  • ­ Lasmar, J. M. (2023). Change, Contestation and Resilience in Great Power Management. In Rebooting Global International Society: Change, Contestation and Resilience. 155-178. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • ­ Lawrence, M. (2019). Violence, Conflict, and World Order: Rethinking War with a Complex Systems Approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo).
  • ­ Leicht, E. A., and Raissa M. D'Souza. (2009). Percolation on interacting networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.0894.
  • ­ Lynch, Marc. (2022). The end of the Middle East: how an old map distorts a new reality." Foreign Aff. 101: 58.
  • ­ Lynch, Marc. (2018). The new Arab order: power and violence in today's Middle East. Foreign Aff., 97, 116.
  • ­ Maoz, Z. (2012). How network analysis can inform the study of international relations. Conflict management and peace science, 29(3), 247-256.
  • ­ Maoz, Z., et al. (2006). Structural equivalence and international conflict: A social networks analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 664-689.
  • ­ Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International security, 43(4), 7-50.
  • ­ Mearsheimer, John J.; and Stephen M. Walt. (2016). The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior US Grand Stategy." Foreign Affairs 95, 70: ‌ Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43946934.
  • ­ Miyagi, Yukiko. (2015). The MENA–EA nexus: Introduction and conceptual framework. The Emerging Middle East–East Asia Nexus. Routledge,1-7.
  • ­ Muddassir Quamar (2022). India and the Persian Gulf: Bilateralism, Regional Security and the China Factor institute for security and development policy.
  • ­ Murray, Donette. (2010). The carcass of dead policies: Lessons for Obama in dealing with Iran, Contemporary Politics 16, 2: 209-223,‌ <DOI:10.1080/13569771003783992>.
  • ­ Nel, P. (2010). Redistribution and recognition: what emerging regional powers want. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 951-974.
  • ­ Neuhäuser, Leonie,et al. (2020). Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on networked systems. Physical Review E 101.3: 032310.
  • ­ Norlen T, Sinai T. (2020). The Abraham Accords–Paradigm Shift or Realpolitik. Marshall Center Security Insight. (64).
  • ­ Norling, N., & Swanström, N. (2007). The Shanghai cooperation organization, trade, and the roles of Iran, India and Pakistan. Central Asian Survey, 26(3), 429-444.
  • ­ Oğuzlu, H. T. (2020). Turkish foreign policy in a changing world order. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 9(1), 127-139.
  • ­ Olimat, M. (2013). China and the Middle East: from silk road to Arab spring. Routledge.
  • ­ Orsini, A, et al. (2020). Complex systems and international governance. International Studies Review, 22(4), 1008-1038.
  • ­ Phillips, Christopher, and Morten Valbjørn. (2018). ‘What is in a name?’: The role of (different) identities in the multiple proxy wars in Syria. Small Wars & Insurgencies 29.3: 414-433.
  • ­ Phillips, Christopher. (2017). Eyes Bigger than Stomachs: Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in Syria." Middle East Policy.
  • ­ Powell, Robert. (1990). Nuclear deterrence theory: The search for credibility. Cambridge University Press.
  • ­ Qian, X. (2016). The New Silk Road in West Asia under “the Belt and Road” Initiative. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 10(1), 26-55.‌
  • ­ Radulescu, et al. (2014). BRICS countries challenge to the world economy new trends. Procedia economics and finance, 8, 605-613.
  • ­ Scott, John. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A handbook Sage Publications London UK. 3.
  • ­ Shariatinia, M., & Azizi, H. (2019). Iran and the Belt and Road Initiative: Amid hope and fear. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(120), 984-994.
  • ­ Simón, Luis, et al. (2021). Nodal defence: the changing structure of US alliance systems in Europe and East Asia. Journal of strategic studies 44.3: 360-388.
  • ­ Snyder, Richard Carlton. (1961). Deterrence, Weapon Systems, and Decicion-making (Vol. 2, No. 3). US Naval Ordnance Test Station.
  • ­ Taş, Hakkı. (2022). Erdoğan and the Muslim Brotherhood: an outside-in approach to Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East. Turkish Studies 23.5: 722-742.
  • ­ Trenin, Dmitri. (2016). Russia in the Middle East: Moscow’s objectives, priorities, and policy drivers. White Paper from the Task Force on US Policy Toward Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia. Carnegie Moscow Center.
  • ­ Wagner, M. (2016). Social emergence in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • ­ Walt, S.M., (2019). The end of hubris and the new age of American restraint. Foreign Aff., 98, 26.
  • ­ Waltz, Kenneth. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • ­ Wani, Ayjaz. (2020). India and China in Central Asia: Understanding the new rivalry in the heart of Eurasia." ORF Occasional. 235.
  • ­ Yom, Sean. (2020). US foreign policy in the Middle East: The logic of hegemonic retreat. Global Policy, 11(1), 75-83.
  • ­ Zakaria, Fareed. (2008). The Post-American World. New York: W W Norton.
  • ­ Zulfqar, Saman. (2018). Competing interests of major powers in the Middle East: The case study of Syria and its implications for regional stability. Perceptions, 23(1), 121-148.