فصلنامه روابط خارجی

فصلنامه روابط خارجی

مذهب و فرهنگ استراتژیک: مطالعه تأثیر مذهب شیعه بر فرهنگ استراتژیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیک، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیک، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
فرهنگ استراتژیک جوهره نگرش نخبگان و جامعه نسبت به مفهوم قدرت و بهره‌گیری از آن در جهان و محیط پیرامونی است. شاخص‌های فرهنگ استراتژیک متأثر از چهار منبع اصلی مذهب و ایدئولوژی، ساختار نظام بین‌الملل، جغرافیا و ژئوپلیتیک و تجربیات تاریخی است. سؤال مقاله از این قرار است که مذهب تشیع چگونه بر فرهنگ استراتژیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران اثر گذاشته است؟ فرضیه مقاله عبارت است از اینکه گفتمان اسلام شیعی، با ایجاد ذهنیت و ادراک استراتژیک، مرزبندی‌های تفکر و رفتار را به‌گونه‌ای تعریف نموده است که از یک جایگاه شبه الهی برخوردار گشته که غیرقابل تخطی است و از طریق «نقش‌آفرینی در تعیین هویت جمعی و مرزبندی هویتی» «تقویت حس استثناگرایی ایرانی» ، «عدالت‌طلبی»، «الهام‌بخشی و معناگرایی» ، «انترناسیونالیسم اسلامی (امت‌گرایی)»، «تأکید بر صلح و امنیت» و «شهادت‌طلبی» بر فرهنگ استراتژیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران اثر گذاشته است. رویکرد این پژوهش توصیفی – تحلیلی، روش آن کیفی و شیوه گردآوری اطلاعات به‌صورت کتابخانه‌ای است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Religion and Strategic Culture: A Case Study of the Impact of Shiite Religion on the Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran

نویسندگان English

Sarem Shiravand 1
Zahra Pishgahifard 2
1 PhD in Political Geography and Geopolitics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Political Geography and Geopolitics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction:The foreign policy of countries is influenced by various domestic and international factors. Strategic culture is the quintessence of the attitude of elites and society towards the concept of power and its use in the world and surrounding environment. In this understanding, strategic culture is not only the use of force and the way of fighting, but also the summary of history, the determinism of geography, the mental accumulation, and reflects a nation's common historical narratives regarding major security issues and the type and manner of its relationship with the world and the surrounding environment. Strategic culture expresses how a specific idea and image are formed in definitions related to war and peace, security and insecurity, friend and enemy, and in a sense, the grand strategies of a state towards other foreign entities, and it exists as an inseparable feature in the policies, behaviors, and actions of states.
Generaly, the sources of strategic culture can be considered to include history, geography and geopolitics, culture and religion, and the structure of the international system, which are common among countries. But at the same time, countries differ, especially in the indicators derived from these sources, and of course, in some areas they also have slight similarities. However, the Islamic Republic of Iran, as an important actor at the regional level, has its own strategic culture, which affects its behavior in foreign policy. In the post-Cold War era, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented its role identity in the structure of the international system as a revisionist actor, opposed to the status quo With a focus on the West, opposed to global domination and arrogance, and a supporter of the underprivileged and Libertarians of the world. The foundation of this actor's foreign policy behavior is the literature of resistance. The strategic culture approach exploits the concept of cultural orientation to explicitly or implicitly explain that different governments have different strategic priorities, which originate from their experiences under the influence of the resources and components of their strategic culture, from the time of formation to the present.
In fact, strategic culture, more than any other component, is capable of studying and revealing the causes and also the macro and often hidden processes in a specific behavior, policy or situation. Therefore, one of the sources of strategic culture that has had a profound impact on the behavior of the Islamic Republic of Iran is religion.
The Research Question:The question that this article is trying to answer is how the Shia religion has influenced the strategic culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Research Hypothesis:The hypothesis is that the discourse of Shiite Islam, by creating a strategic mindset and perception, has defined the demarcations of thought and behavior in such a way that it has a quasi-divine position that is inviolable and It has influenced the strategic culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran through the “ Role-playing in determining collective identity and identity demarcation”, “Strengthening the Sense of Iranian Exceptionalism”,” Seeking justice”, “Inspiration and Semanticism”,” Islamic internationalism”, “Emphasis on peace and security”and ” Seeking martyrdom”.
Methods: This article uses a qualitative and descriptive approach to analyze the content of selected data along with topic analysis. The theoretical approach of the research is based on the conceptual framework of Strategic culture. Strategic culture provides an analytical lens through which one can better see the continuities underlying international crises and the motivations a state's actions.
The study of strategic culture teaches us how to understand and interpret government and military actions, how to place specific maneuvers in a broader historical context, and, as a result, how to better predict government behavior.
In fact, strategic culture is not a limiting lens through which to look at the past or the future. Rather, it is a useful tool for understanding how the conditions under which a state defines the appropriate means and goals to achieve its security objectives.
Results and discussion: Religious and cultural narratives and experiences shape the boundaries of thought and action. As the source of strategic culture, they create a strategic mindset and understanding that defines behaviors, thoughts, and actions, so violating them seems impossible. Here, strategic understanding and mindset refers to the understanding that is created from the components of strategic culture And religion, as one of the important sources of strategic culture, plays a decisive role in the formation of this mentality. In post-revolutionary Iran, Shiite Islam plays a fundamental and pivotal role in shaping the worldview and perceptions of decision-making elites and And the Constitution explicitly emphasizes the central position and role of Islam and the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist. In fact, Shiite Islamism is the most important ideological and Thought structure that has evolved. the national identity of the Islamic Republic of Iran and, consequently, its foreign policy identity. In fact, the Islamic Republic of Iran has become the first embodiment of the idea of political Islam. Under the influence of this ideology and religion, Iranians have defined a spiritual mission for themselves and take moral, spiritual, and religious considerations into account in designing their strategies, tactics, and major military and defense plans and geopolitical codes. Islamic ideology has played an important role in creating the discourse of Iran's international identity and role, which, by defining and highlighting the Islamic identity for Iran, has guided it to define appropriate interests and goals, and ultimately led to the formation of a foreign policy derived from the Shiite religion and its jurisprudential framework. In other words, the approach of the Islamic Republic of Iran is to interact with the outside world centered on religion and belief, and in the process of interacting with the new world, it considers the ultimate goal and purpose of man to be in the Hereafter bliss, Accordingly, modeling and explaining the model in relation to the new world has its own complexities. Therefore, identity, cultural, and spiritual variables play a significant and important role in the articulation of foreign policy, including diplomatic policy.
Conclusion: Strategic culture is an effective tool for studying foreign policy with an ontological security approach and the behaviors that emanate from it, and it will be able to easily examine the ambiguous angles and dimensions of a particular country's behaviors. On this basis, within the framework of strategic culture, an attempt was made to examine how the Islamic Republic of Iran is influenced by the Shiite religion. In the present era, despite having the theoretical and practical foundations of a modern coordinate, international relations are directly and indirectly influenced by the teachings, values and narratives that originate from religion in various ways. Shiite Islam emerged in a specific geographical space and in connection with specific ethnic groups that were settled in this space. Shiism gives a special meaning to territory and land, and therefore, in the geopolitical space of Iran, under the influence of Shiism as the official and dominant religion, a specific method of thinking and governance is established in the territorial space of Iran through narrative creation, and it has equipped its followers and believers with a specific form of geopolitical imagery and insight. In other words, in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the religious legacy left by Shiite Islam has had a profound impact on the strategic culture and orientations, macro goals, policies, and strategic behavior in foreign policy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Religion
strategic culture
strategic perception
foreign policy
  • Aghaei, Seyed Davoud, Rasouli, Elham (2009), "Structuralism and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Towards Israel", Politics Quarterly, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Volume 39, Number 1, Spring.
  • Alihosseini, A. and Keshavarz, H. R. (2016). Functions of Concept of Expediency in Islamic Republic of Iran. , 6(20), 1-20.
  • Ayatollah Khamenei (2023), Dignity, Wisdom and Expediency in Foreign Policy, Speech at the Meeting of Officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ambassadors of the Islamic Republic of Iran with the Leader of the Revolution, available at: https://farsi.khamenei.ir/newspart-index?tid=1940.
  • Aghamohammadi, Ebrahim (2017), "Foundations of Ideological Identity in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Islamic State Journal, Year 23, Number 85, Issue 3, Autumn.
  • ­Al-Rodhan, Nayef(2015), Strategic Culture and Pragmatic National
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi, Jalal. and Peyman Vahabpour (2015). Ontological Security in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies.
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi, Seyed Jalal (2014), "Moderation Discourse in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Foreign Policy Quarterly, Year 28, Number 1, Spring.1-39.
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi, Seyed Jalal and Firouzeh Radfar (2018), Patterns of Exporting Revolution in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Imam Sadeq University (AS).
  • hanan,hamidreza, (2020), “.A Review on Peaceful Approach of Prescribing Jihad in Islam”,.Theological – Doctrinal Research (Islamic Azad University-Saveh Branch, Year 10, 2(38).
  • Khomeini, Ruhollah (2013), Tahrir al-Wasilah, Institute for the Compilation and Publication of the Works of Imam Khomeini (PBUH), available at: http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/c78.
  • Mousavi Shafaei, Seyed Masoud (2008), Developmentalism; The Requirement of Iran's Foreign Policy, Tehran: Office for the Development of Science Production.
  • QorbanPour Dashtaki, A. (2018). Approach of National “Strategic Culture” in Multilateral Cultural Diplomacy Model with an Emphasis on Cultural Security. Transcendent Policy, 5(19), 95-112.
  • Valizadeh, Akbar, Firouzian Haji, Gholamreza, & Shoja, Morteza. (2015). An Introduction to the Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Islamic Revolution Research Quarterly, 4(2), 145-166.
  • Akbarzadeh, Shahram & Barry, James (2016) “State Identity in Iranian Foreign Policy”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 43:4.
  • Asgari, M. (2018). Strategic Culture of I.R. of Iran; Factors and Features. Defence Studies, 16(1), 87-127.
  • Asgarian, Abbasgholi, Shiravand, Sarem, Mousavi Gharalari, Mirhadi (2014), "The Role of Language in Discourse-Making of Cultural Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Quarterly Journal of Political and International Research, No. 19, Summer.
  • Bruner, Jerome (1991), ‘The Narrative Construction of Reality’, Critical Inquiry 18, Autumn.
  • Cain, Anthony C(2002). Iran’s Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Implications of US Policy. Air University Press, 2002. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13692. Accessed 30 Jan. 2024.
  • Eisenstadt, M. (2015). “The Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Religion, Expediency, and Soft Power in an Era of Disruptive Change”, Middle East Studies at Marine Corps University (MES), MES Monographs, No. 7, available at: https:// www. washingtoninstitute. org/uploads/Documents/pubs/MESM_7_Eisenstadt.pdf [accessed 24 July 2022].
  • Eslami, Mohsen, Ranjbar Muhammadi, Mostafa, Davand, Muhammad (2022), ­“Methodology of Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Politics of Enmity with the Oppressor and Support for the Oppressed)”, Jurnal of Contemporary Research on Islamic Revolution, Volume 4, No.12, Spring.
  • Farsoun, S.K., & Mashayekhi, M. (Eds.). (1992). Iran: Political Culture in the Islamic Republic (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993514.
  • Fox, J. (2018). An Introduction to Religion and Politics: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183787.
  • Ghahramanpour, Rahman (2010). “The Priority of Inspiration over Soft Power in the Macro-Policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Islamic World”, Defense Strategy Quarterly, Year 8, Number 28.147-172.
  • Ghanbarloo, A. (2013). Strategic culture and national defence: case study of imposed war. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(57), 31-50.
  • ghorbi, S. M. J. (2015). Components of inspiration and Islamic Republic of Iran 's soft power in the Islamic world: Study the general policies of the sixth development plan. , 5(16), 85-116.
  • Glenn John(2009). Realism versus strategic culture: Competition and collaboration?. International studies review, vol.11.N.3. DOI:1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00872.x
  • Hunter, J. D. (2010). To change the world: The irony, tragedy, and possibility of Christianity in the late modern world. Oxford University Press.
  • Interest, Global Policy journal,School of Government and International Affiars, Durham University, 22 July, Available at: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/22/07/2015/strategic-culture-and-pragmatic-national-interest.
  • Humphreys, B. (2016). Russian exceptionalism: a comparative perspective. Politics in Central Europe, 12(1), 9-20.
  • Kongonis, Thomas(2020), Examining the impact of strategic culture on the conception and operation of human ability in war and strategy, Master of thesis, Department of Security Studies and Criminology, November, Macquarie University.
  • Kabiri, A. (2020). Foreign policy taken from the thought system of Imam Khamenei (as) And its impact on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Holy Defense Studies, 6(4), 55-75.
  • Litvak, Meir. (2020).»God’s Favored Nation”: The New Religious Nationalism in Iran«, Religions 11, no. 10: 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100541.
  • Anastasia V, Vladimir G. Takhtamyshev, Alexander P. Bandurin, Nikolai P. Lyubetsky, Ilya G. Sharkov, Lyudmila B. Tomilina, Sergei I.
  • Mazurkiewicz, Piotr. (2021). Geopolitics and religion. n book: Geopolitics (pp.347-371)Publisher: Ignatianum University Press.
  • Miskimmon, Alister, O'Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura (2012), ‘Forging the World:Strategic Narratives and International Relations’,Working Paper; Royal Holloway, University of London.
  • Moshirzadeh, H., & Nazifpour, A. (2020). Iranian Exceptionalism and Iran-US Relations: From 1979 to 2021. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 11(32).
  • Motlabi, Masoud. (2013). "Fields of Religionism in Iran’s Contemporary political Culture, Intercultural Studies Quarterly, 7(18). 105-134.
  • Mottaqi, Ebrahim and Kazemi, Hojjat (2007). "Constructivism, Identity, Language and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Politics Quarterly, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Volume 37, Number 4. Winter.209-237.
  • Nasiri Pooya, Hadi. (2019). National Dignity in Iran's Foreign Policy Orientations from the Perspective of the Supreme Leader. Quarterly Journal of Research Culture, 13(No. 43-Fall 2019), 69-92.
  • Ozkan, Mehmet(2021), “How Religion Shapes Foreign Policy? An Explanatory Model for Non-Western States”, Religions 12(8). 617.org/10.3390/rel12080617.
  • Salimi, H. (2007). A Constructivist Study on National Identity in Iran. National Studies Journal, 8(31), 31-53.
  • Shahram Nia, A.M. & Nazifi Naeini, N. (2013). The Interaction of Nationalism and Islamism in Iran after the Victory of the Islamic Revolution. Strategic Policy Research, 2(5), 197-217.
  • Shabannia, Qasem. (2019). Behavioral Implications of the Principle of Dignity in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Jurisprudence and Politics, 1(No. 2), 89-115.
  • Shokoohi, S. (2023). Iranian Exceptionalism and Its Effects on Tehran’s Foreign Relations. Political and International Approaches, 14(2), 41-62.
  • Slaveski, Stojan (2009), “Macedonian Strategic Culture and Institutional Choice: Integration or Isolation?”, WESTERN BALKANS SECURITY OBSERVER, Journal of the Belgrade School of Security Studies, Year 4 No. 14. JULY-SEPTEMBER.
  • Stanley, Willis (2006), "The Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Defense Threat Reduction, Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office.
  • Torki, H. and Shariati, S. (2023). Discourse Analysis of Iran and China Leaders towards the International System. Foreign Relations, 15(3), 134-156.
  • Warner, Carolyn M. and Walker, Stephen G. (2011), “Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis”, Foreign Policy Analysis, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2011.
  • Yaqouti, Mohammad Mehdi. (2011). Analysis of Foreign Policy and Foreign Policy Identity of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 25(1), 1-28.