فصلنامه روابط خارجی

فصلنامه روابط خارجی

دیپلماسی علمی و حکمرانی شهری: تحلیل تطبیقی تجارب کلان‌شهرهای بارسلون، بوستون، پکن، استانبول و ارائه الگوی راهبردی برای کلان‌شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 هیئت علمی مطالعات منطقه ای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 هیئت‌ علمی روابط بین‌الملل، پژوهشکده تحقیقات راهبردی، تهران، ایران
3 فارغ التحصیل دکتری روابط بین الملل، پژوهشگر مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 دبیر کمیته راهبری پایش و رتبه بندی شهری مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزی شهر تهران, ایران
10.22034/fr.2025.565028.1745
چکیده
دیپلماسی علمی به‌عنوان ابزاری نوین در حکمرانی شهری، ظرفیت آن را دارد که جایگاه کلان‌شهرها را در نظام بین‌الملل دانش‌بنیان ارتقا دهد. این مقاله، با تمرکز بر تهران و بررسی تطبیقی تجارب نوآورانه چهار کلان‌شهر «بارسلون»، «بوستون»، «پکن» و «استانبول»، می‌کوشد به این پرسش پاسخ دهد که چگونه سیاست‌گذاری شهری می‌تواند از طریق شبکه‌سازی علمی، برندینگ دانش‌بنیان و مشارکت دانشگاه‌ها و شرکت‌های نوآور، به بهبود الگوهای مدیریت شهری و همچنین تقویت موقعیت بین‌المللی یک شهر از قبیل تهران کمک کند؟ یافته‌های پژوهش با استفاده از روش تطبیقی نشان می‌دهد «بارسلون» با ابتکار عمل «اکوسیستم نوآورانه»، «بوستون» با «نوآوری دانشگاه‌محور»، «پکن» با «دیپلماسی علمی دولتی-توسعه‌ای» و «استانبول» با «مزیت‌سازی هویت فرهنگی»، هر یک الگوهای متفاوتی را در دیپلماسی علمی شهری دنبال کرده‌اند. تحلیل تطبیقی نشان می‌دهد تهران علی‌رغم ظرفیت بالای دانشگاه‌ها، پژوهشگاه‌ها و زیست‌بوم فناوری، فاقد یک سند راهبردی دیپلماسی علمی شهری، نظام هماهنگ‌کننده ذی‌نفعان و ساختار منسجم برندینگ علمی است. مقاله در پایان یک الگوی راهبردی تلفیقی برای تهران پیشنهاد می‌کند که بر چهار محور استوار است: «حکمرانی شبکه‌ای»، «دیپلماسی دانشگاه محور»، «برندسازی علمی–فرهنگی» و «پیوند با سیاست‌های ملی علم، فناوری و فرهنگ» که می‌تواند مسیر گذار تهران به یک شهر دانش‌بنیان با حضور فعال در شبکه‌های علمی منطقه‌ای و جهانی را هموار کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Scientific Diplomacy and Urban Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Barcelona, Boston, Beijing, Istanbul, and a Strategic Framework for Tehran

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Reza Majidi 1
Rahim Baizidi 2
Asgar Safari 3
Mahsa Golabi Dezfouli 4
1 Associate Professor, Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor in International Relations, Institute for Strategic Research, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD in International Relations, Researcher in Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC), Tehran, Iran
4 Executive Secretary of the Urban Monitoring and Ranking Streering Committee ,Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Scientific diplomacy, as an emerging instrument in urban governance, has the potential to enhance the position of global cities within the knowledge-based international system. Focusing on Tehran and employing a comparative analysis of four metropolitan cases—Barcelona, Boston, Beijing, and Istanbul—this article seeks to answer the following question: How can urban policymaking, through scientific networking, knowledge-based branding, and the engagement of universities and innovative enterprises, contribute to improving urban management patterns and strengthening the international standing of a city such as Tehran?
The findings, derived from a comparative methodology, indicate that each city has pursued a distinct model of urban scientific diplomacy: Barcelona through its “innovative ecosystem initiative,” Boston through “university-driven innovation,” Beijing through “state-developmental scientific diplomacy,” and Istanbul through “cultural-identity advantage building.” The comparative analysis reveals that despite Tehran’s significant potential—stemming from its universities, research institutes, and technology ecosystem—it lacks a strategic document for urban scientific diplomacy, a stakeholder coordination mechanism, and a coherent scientific branding structure. The article concludes by proposing an integrated strategic model for Tehran, built upon four pillars: networked governance, university-centered diplomacy, scientific-cultural branding, and alignment with national science, technology, and cultural policies. This model can facilitate Tehran’s transition toward becoming a knowledge-based city with active participation in regional and global scientific networks.
Keywords: Scientific Diplomacy, Urban Governance, Innovation Ecosystems, Global Cities, Barcelona, Boston, Beijing, Istanbul, Tehran
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In the emerging knowledge-based global order, cities have become significant actors capable of shaping transnational scientific interactions, innovation networks, and cultural-knowledge exchanges. Urban diplomacy is increasingly intertwined with scientific and technological capabilities, enabling cities to develop distinctive global identities and attract flows of talent, investment, innovation, and collaborative research. Within this context, scientific diplomacy has evolved into a strategic instrument for strengthening the international visibility of cities, expanding their innovation ecosystems, and contributing to national soft power. This study examines the role of scientific diplomacy in urban governance through a comparative assessment of four global cities (Barcelona, Boston, Beijing, and Istanbul) and proposes a strategic model for Tehran.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to analyze how leading cities use scientific diplomacy as a tool of urban governance, to identify the strengths and gaps in Tehran’s current approach, and to offer a strategic framework that can assist Tehran in transitioning toward a knowledge-based and internationally engaged metropolis.
Methodology
The research employs a qualitative and comparative methodology. First, a thematic review of the scientific diplomacy practices of Barcelona, Boston, Beijing, and Istanbul is conducted, focusing on governance mechanisms, institutional actors, frameworks of scientific collaboration, and policies for city branding. Second, these findings are compared with the current situation in Tehran using dimensions such as innovation infrastructure, stakeholder coordination, international presence, and cultural-knowledge positioning. Data were drawn from policy analyses, institutional reports, and qualitative insights derived from the structure and discourse of the urban innovation and diplomacy landscape.
Findings
The comparative analysis identifies four distinct models of scientific diplomacy in global cities:
1.     Barcelona, the Creative Ecosystem Model: Barcelona leverages its culture of design, creativity, and urban innovation to build research networks, foster technology districts, and cultivate an international scientific brand rooted in openness and collaboration.
2.     Boston, the University-Centered Innovation Model: Boston’s scientific diplomacy is deeply connected to world-class academic institutions such as MIT and Harvard. These universities anchor global collaborations, attract top talent, foster high-tech entrepreneurship, and form the backbone of the region’s international scientific presence.
3.     Beijing, the State-Driven Science Diplomacy Model: Beijing utilizes a state-led developmental approach that aligns urban scientific diplomacy with national science and technology strategies. Through large-scale investments, scientific megaprojects, and strong government coordination, the city has rapidly built global research networks.
4.     Istanbul, the Culture–Science Hybrid Model: Istanbul promotes a culturally grounded identity combined with expanding academic networks and regional connectivity. Its scientific diplomacy blends cultural heritage with emerging innovation initiatives.
When comparing these cases with Tehran, several significant strengths and gaps emerge:
v Strengths: Tehran hosts leading universities, research centers, a rapidly expanding technology ecosystem, and strong cultural assets. It possesses human capital and scientific capacity that could support an active urban scientific diplomacy strategy.
v Gaps: Most notably, Tehran lacks an integrated strategic document for urban scientific diplomacy, suffers from fragmented governance across scientific and municipal institutions, and does not possess a coherent international scientific branding strategy.
Existing capacities are dispersed and insufficiently connected to global networks.
Coordination between academia, industry, and city governance remains limited.
Practical Implications
The findings suggest that Tehran requires a multi-level governance strategy that integrates science, technology, culture, and urban development. Practical steps include:
v Establishing a dedicated scientific diplomacy office within Tehran’s municipal governance structure;
v Developing international partnerships with universities and innovation districts in leading cities;
v Enhancing branding initiatives to position Tehran as a city of science, heritage, and innovation;
v Strengthening collaboration among universities, research institutes, technology parks, cultural organizations, and the municipal government.
Social Implications
A robust scientific diplomacy strategy can foster social innovation, enhance public engagement with science, improve the city’s talent retention, and encourage a more inclusive knowledge society. It can also facilitate cultural-scientific linkages that promote mutual understanding and global dialogue.
Originality
This study provides one of the first comprehensive frameworks for conceptualizing scientific diplomacy within the context of Iranian urban governance. By combining comparative global insights with Tehran’s specific opportunities and challenges, the paper offers an innovative hybrid model tailored to the sociocultural, technological, and institutional realities of Tehran. The strategic model proposed here contributes to broader debates on the emerging role of cities as scientific actors in the global system.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Scientific Diplomacy
Urban Governance
Innovation Ecosystems
Global Cities
Barcelona
Boston
Beijing
Istanbul
Tehran
-      بایزیدی، رحیم (1401). راهبرد نگاه به شرق در سیاست خارجی ایران؛ مؤلفه‌های راهبردی و تحولات آینده. فصلنامه آینده‌پژوهی راهبردی، 1(2)، 137-159.
-      بایزیدی، رحیم (1403). ارزیابی نقش دیپلماسی علمی در عرصه خارجی مدیریت شهری. مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
-      بایزیدی، رحیم؛ عباسی خوشکار، امیر (1401). بحران جهانی محیط زیست و چالش‌های ساختاری در نظام بین‌الملل. رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی, 13(3)، 57-85.
-       بایزیدی، رحیم؛ میرترابی، سید سعید (1403). نظام تحریم گرایی و اقتصاد سیاسی تحریم در سیاست داخلی و خارجی آمریکا: واکاوی اثربخشی و چالش‌های تحریم گرایی آمریکا. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، 16(2)، 29-62.
-      زرقانی، سید هادی؛ رنجکش، محمدجواد؛ اسکندران، منصوره (1393). دیپلماسی شهری، تحلیل نقش شهرها به‌عنوان بازیگر جدید عرصه روابط بین‌الملل. مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری منطقه‌ای، سال پنجم، شماره 20.
-      یزدان‌پناه، مهدی؛ مرادی، مریم؛ عسگرخانی، ابومحمد (1401)، دیپلماسی علمی و فناوری و توسعه سیاسی در ایران، پژوهش‌های سیاسی جهان اسلام، دوره ۱۲، شماره ۳.
 References
-      Abdullah, Nura & Roig, Laura. (2021). City-led Science Diplomacy: Building Urban Resilience through the Science–Policy Interface. Science & Diplomacy, 10(3), 45–62.
-      Akuto, Emmanuel. (2013). Global Cities, Governance and Diplomacy: The Urban Link. Palgrave Macmillan.
-      Baizidi, Rahim (2022). Look to the East Strategy in Iran's Foreign Policy; Strategic components and future developments. Strategic Futures Studies, 1(2), 137-159. DOR: 20.1001.1.28212592.1401.1.2.6.0
-      Baizidi, Rahim (2023). Sectarian Model of Power Distribution and Political Efficiency in Governmental Structure of Iraq and Lebanon. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(4), 45-66. Doi: 10.22034/igq.2023.143225
-      Baizidi, Rahim (2024). Iran's Neighborhood Policy: A Strategic Choice or Foreign Policy Necessity. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 15(1), 55-68. Doi: 10.22034/irfa.2023.210014
-      Baizidi, Rahim and Abbasi Khoshkar, Amir (2022). Global Environmental Crisis and Structural Challenges in the International System. Political and International Approaches, 13(3), 57-85. Doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.225988.1203
-      Baizidi, Rahim and Mirtorabi, Seyed Saeed (2024). The System of Sanctionism and the Political Economy of Sanctions in U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Effectiveness and Challenges of U.S. Sanctionism. International Quarterly of Foreign Relations, 16(2), 29-62. Doi: 10.22034/fr.2024.489822.1605
-      Davis, Lloyd. (2014). Science Diplomacy: Day’s Dawn or False Dawn? World Scientific.
-      Kaltofen, Laura & Akuto, Emmanuel. (2018). Science Diplomacy: An Introduction to a Boundary Issue. Global Policy, 9(3), 10–24.
-      Kühner, Simon. (2022). Science Diplomacy as Soft Power: City Networks and Knowledge Exchange. Global Policy, 13(2), 189–202.
-      Li, Xiaoming & Hong, Yu. (2020). Science and Technology Diplomacy in China’s Urban Development: The Case of Beijing. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(2), 189–205.
-      Majidi, M. R. (2022). Parliamentary Diplomacy: Its Evolution and Role in International Relations. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 12(34), 306-329.
-      Manfredi Sánchez, Juan. (2021). Urban Diplomacy: Cosmopolitan Perspectives. Routledge.
-      Nye, Joseph (2011) the Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
-      Rahim Baizidi (2019). Paradoxical Class: Paradox of Interest and Political Conservatism in Middle Class, Asian Journal of Political Science, Volume 27, 2019 - Issue 3, pp. 272-285. Doi: 10.1080/02185377.2019.1642772
-      Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. (2017). Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations. Springer.
-      Shirkhani, Mohammad ali and Baizidi, Rahim (2018). Immigration, Human Capital Exit and Development: Comparing Iran and Turkey. Political and International Approaches, 10(2), 98-122.